Fiscal Activism / fiscal consolidation: After Pandemic affects
Fiscal Activism / fiscal consolidation
The flailing Indian economy, affected by the Covid-19 pandemic, is
characterized by a contraction of GDP that needs a government drive. The
government has resorted to Keynesian economics (government spending rather than the free hand of the market) in this
situation.
A selective
departure from the values of the free market is the 2021 Budget. The
government adheres to elements of market ideology, such as privatization and a
greater position for foreign direct investment, but has tried to spend more to
boost growth.
The fact that the Finance Minister's speech aims to reduce the fiscal deficit to 4.5%
of GDP by 2025-26 and promises to bring an amendment to the FRBM Act to
formalize the new goals can be reflected
in this (the present target as per the FRBM Act is of 3 percent ).
The budget thus represents a major break from one of the main tenets of
the Washington Consensus, the market-oriented economic system that has
dominated policy-making in most parts of the globe. While this is a step in the
right direction, there are some key questions regarding macroeconomic stability.
Departure
from Free-Market Economics principles
§ Budget 2021 is focused on six pillars: health
and well-being, physical and financial resources and infrastructure,
aspirational India inclusive growth, human capital revitalization, innovation
and R&D, and minimum government-maximum governance.
§ This would entail substantial funding increases, not just from the
central government, but also from the states and the private sector. This could
be reflected in some of the budget's following highlights:
·
A whopping 34.5 percent rise in budget allocation
is present in the current budget. Rs 5.54 lakh crore.
·
A new bad bank structure has been suggested by the
Budget to deal with the question of non-performing assets. A massive amount of
capital would be needed to fund it, considering the size of the NPA.
·
The government has also announced the establishment
of a development finance institution to provide infrastructure projects with
long-term financing.
|
Constraint on intertemporal budget ·
The
"intertemporal budget constraint" means that any debt that is
outstanding today must be paid for by a potential source of revenue. ·
Blanchard claimed
that if the Interest Rate-Growth Differential (IRGD), the difference between
the interest rate and growth rate, becomes negative, intertemporal budget
constraints do not apply. ·
In the advanced
economies, the state of Blanchard has been met as interest rates have turned
negative. Therefore, policymakers do not have to fear that deficits would
make government debt unsustainable.
|
IMF & World Bank Endorsed Idea
· In the aftermath of the pandemic, the International
Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, both flag-bearers of the Washington
Consensus, urged a break from fiscal orthodoxy.
· Both of these organizations used to be wary of any
rise in the ratio of public debt to GDP above 100%.
· Today, even though the debt-to-GDP ratio is poised
to grow to 125 percent by the end of 2021, they urge industrialized economies
to invest more by running up deficits.
Main Problems for Macroeconomic
Stability
Inflation Might Rise: There is concern that inflation will rise due to
a large fiscal deficit.
·
Moreover, a change in the fiscal
consolidation goals is more than likely to entail a 4 percent change in the
inflation target set by India's Reserve Bank. The Budget, however, makes no
mention of such a possibility.
Low tax-to-GDP ratio: Another issue is that, with the tax-to-GDP ratio
not increasing as planned, through strategic disinvestment, privatization, and
monetization of non-core properties, the government must concentrate on raising
more non-tax revenues.
·
These measures, however, have their own
problems.
Disinvestment, a high-risk strategy: In the years ahead, sales of public assets have
become essential for reducing fiscal deficits. This is a high-risk approach,
however.
·
Revenues from disinvestment have fallen
short of goals for years now. For instance, the sales of Air India, which
started in 2018, are still dragging on.
·
Moreover, because of public sector
unions and job cuts, selling public assets is politically controversial.
Downgrade of ratings: A significant factor is the concern that if total
public debt crossed, India will be downgraded by the rating agencies, say, 10
percent-11 percent of GDP.
Conflict with AtmaNirbharta: In addition, substantial FDI is almost always
involved in large-scale privatization. Rising FDI would result in a significant
increase in the domestic economies' international presence.
·
A rise in FDI, however, may not be
consistent with Atmanirbhar Bharat, which implies greater self-reliance and stronger
Indian firms.
Crowding Out Effect: As an expansionary fiscal policy posture is
adopted by the government and its spending is increased to improve economic
activity.
·
This will lead to a rise in interest
rates. Private investment decisions are influenced by increased interest rates.
·
The high magnitude of the crowding-out
impact can also result in lower economic revenues.
Conclusion-
A deviation is
welcome from fiscal orthodoxy. But to make it more viable, the government needs
to think of ways.


Post a Comment